Mitt Romney, the American presidential candidate hoping to replace Barrack Obama, spoke to the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) at their national convention in Reno Nevada. Here’s an excerpt (hopefuly not taken out of context) from that speech.
“The President’s policies have made it harder to recover from the deepest recession in seventy years, exposed the military to cuts that no one can justify, compromised our national-security secrets, and in dealings with other nations, given trust where it is not earned, insult where it is not deserved, and apology where it is not due,”
This, I would have to say, is about as critical as one can get without resorting to expletives and name calling. Unfortunately, it’s light on too many points. It’s like a thesis statement coming before a volley of evidence. Meanwhile, in London, the Daily Telegraph quotes an unnamed Romney advisor as saying, “We are part of an Anglo-Saxon heritage, and he feels that the special relationship is special. The White House didn’t fully appreciate the shared history we have.”
Translation: “I’m white, you’re white, Obama’s not white, so you should like me better. Let’s go be white somewhere in private and talk about how awesome that is.”
Those willing to drink the red Republican cool-aid will smile and nod their heads. Surely they will hear Romney’s words about the president’s policies making it harder to recover from the deepest recession in seventy years, and place that squarely on Obama’s shoulders. So what’s your plan for fixing the economy Mitt? Remove all restrictions from big business and let them do their thing? Reduce taxes? The economy doesn’t suck because of Obama. The economy sucks all over the planet. It’s not like this is an American problem – it’s a global problem. Capitalist economies require constant growth, low labor costs, easy access to resources, and a consumer market with cash. He’s also stated at one point that he’s going to talk tough to China about their manipulation of their currency. Really? I think the Chinese are going to laugh at you Mitt. (Actually, they’re probably laughing right now – all the way to the bank). Who have we borrowed the most money from Mitt? Where do we get most of our cheap manufacturing labor from Mitt? When was the last time a lender paid attention to a borrower’s complaints about their lending practices? Sure, the federal government in this country can impose laws on our own banks, but can a borrower country impose laws on the lending practices of another country?
As for the military cuts, I think Mitt is referring to the cuts that congress voted for – the one that was approved by Republicans to cut military spending by 50 billion. So, these are cuts that no one can justify? I think not, Mitt. If you want to reduce the deficit, then you have to cut something. And if you’re going to bitch about what was cut, then you better identify what you’d cut instead. What would that be, Mitt? Entitlement programs? If you want to end social security and eliminate government jobs, then make that statement. Otherwise, STFU. In short, if you disagree with Obama’s policies, then STATE what you would have done. Just bitching about them tells me nothing. Does that actually work on some voters? If so, then we’re FUCKED.
“This is very simple,” Romney said. “If you don’t want America to be the strongest nation on earth, I’m not your president. But with his cuts to the military, you have that president today.”
Dude… maybe you should bitch about your fellow Republicans who voted for those cuts? They’ll love you for it! But it’s easier just to point the finger, isn’t it? “It was the other guys! They did it!” Dammit, man, you sound like a pansy. Go hook a defibrillator to your balls or something.
And Obama compromised our national-security secrets? This is most likely related to the unproven allegation that the white house intentionally released classified information about the military raid that killed Osama bin Laden. Maybe you should start with saying, “When President Obama finally took out the bastard responsible for blowing up the twin towers…” Yeah, start with that.
Obama has called such accusations “offensive” and said no member of his administration knowingly disclosed national security secrets.
If you can prove Obama leaked intel, Mitt, you won’t have to release the rest of your tax returns! And while you’re at it, you can also prove that our space program was sponsored by aliens, that we’re secretly genetically engineering a race of intelligent monkeys for use in war, and that other worlds out in space are populated by Humans descended from the 13th tribe of Israel. Damn, but I’m serious when I say I want proof of these things, because without that truth, I simply find them very unlikely. Am I just supposed to take it on faith?
Now about the “and in dealings with other nations, given trust where it is not earned, insult where it is not deserved, and apology where it is not due,” bit of that speech. How has Obama’s foreign policy been working, Mitt? Is it a total disaster?
In direct contrast to Romney’s claims, Obama said U.S. relations with its allies have never been stronger and that his administration has advanced a “new era of American leadership” that made the nation “safer and stronger and more respected in the world.”
Sound bites, from both sides. Very useful – NOT. So how does the rest of the world really view America? This is a question that I cannot answer. I do, however, have some suspicions that the world probably views America in a much more favorable light than it did during the Bush administration when people in other countries were offering us their condolences for having an idiot for commander and chief. So the question is: how will the world view us if you are elected as president? I should let the other nations of the world make that determination if it happens. We can count the condolence cards they send and see if they equal the Bush administration. I will give you this, you at least appear to be a better orator than W, so even if you’re spouting BS, it will sound stately. No one wants to be on a sinking ship with a sputtering Captain calling orders. Stand tall as you drive us into the rocks, and ensure us everything will be fine.
Vice President Biden rebutted Romney, saying the Republican failed to lay out a specific, workable foreign policy.
“Gov. Romney had an opportunity to fulfill a long-standing promise by laying out his foreign policy vision and agenda,” Biden said. “Instead, all we heard from Gov. Romney was empty rhetoric and bluster.”
You were expecting something else Joe? I mean, it’s nice of you to point this out to anyone who wasn’t paying attention, but we’re still waiting to hear Mitt tell us what his foreign policy is going to be. So far, it seems to be something related to, “we’re America, and we’re tough, so if you praise us thoroughly and buy our shit, we’ll send our troops to do your bidding when you need them.” One of Romney’s advisors referred to President Obama as a “left winger” who “doesn’t value the NATO alliance as much” and who is “very comfortable with American decline.” This was apparently said from a “position of anonymity” as Mr. Romney’s campaign requested that they not criticize the President to foreign media.
I’m confused by this. Is there some perception that “foreign media” doesn’t pay any attention to the shit the Romney campaign says about the president while he’s IN this country? It’s not as if the internet doesn’t exist, or television, or telephones. Since when does saying something bad in one place mean no one else hears it? If you’re going to bitch about the president at home, Mitt, you might as well bitch to the foreign media too. It’s not as if they haven’t already heard it.
Personally, I’d like to hear about Romney’s plan for dealing with Syria, what he’s got in mind for Iran’s nuclear arsenal, how he’s going to deal with the Chinese/Japanese territorial disputes, what his thoughts are on dealing with China’s claim of Taiwan, how he’s going to deal with North Korea if they decide to sell some nukes? And how about the drug war taking place on our border with Mexico? Where IS Mitt’s fricken foreign policy? Does he have a team of television sit-com writers working on the best way to divulge this in a humorous manner?
As it is now, the political game seems to be nothing more than, “the other guys sucks.” This is then followed by “what the other guy said about me is bullshit.” Which is then followed by, “the other guy hasn’t said anything about what he’s actually going to do.” More sound-bites ensue.
I can’t wait for the debates.
Filed under: Bitching, Politics Tagged: | Romney VFW Speech



Like you, I’m waiting for both candidates to start detailing their own positions, rather than lobbing mudballs at the opposition. The trouble is, of course, that there really ARE a lot of voters out there who chug the Kool-Aid and decide hell yeah, they’ll vote for the guy selling the cherry flavor because that’s always been their favorite.
Check this out: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/romney-aides-cite-anglo-saxon-heritage/story?id=16853252#.UBAh_bRfHMo
Typical politician. This guy does it wrong but I have nothing to say about how to do it right.
Yep. Vote for me, I’m… not him. I’m something else! I’m, uh… well… I’m white! And also, I’m uh… what’s the word I’m looking for? Oh! I’m an experienced businessman! Yeah, that’s it! I can avoid paying millions in taxes using loopholes, so… imagine what I can do for the country! Did I mention I’m not from Kenya? Not that there’s anything wrong with Kenya. We should produce a bunch of products there! And then sell them here! Let’s see… what can we make? Presidential Dolls! Wouldn’t you like a doll of me?
I’m so tired of the rhetoric. Republicans don’t appear to be blessed with good memories.
George W. Bush’s record has been buried. George W. Bush was viewed by tea baggers a “good old boy” in office. This is despite his outrageous death causing lies, exaggerations, manipulations, abuse of power, and the fact that he is, in essence, a war criminal. That’s not to mention his many other failures in office that have had a profoundly negative effect on his country, its economy, its citizens, and the country’s image around the world.
8 years of Bush and how did he perform?
(1) Economic mismanagement – Bush’s tax cuts for the rich reduced annual tax revenue available for public needs hundreds of billions each year. The Bush Administrations simultanoeusly created all time high record military budgtets and all time record high poverty rates in America. McCain’s plan was more of the same.
(2) Afghanistan and invasion of Iraq plan – Bush/Cheney’s occupation of Afghanistan and invasion of Iraq plan has cost American citizens trillions of dollars of debt and interest. This is not to mention the human loss of men and women being sent home in body bags who would have otherwise lived, worked and paid taxes. The tab is estimated to be well into the trillions when you add rehabilitation for injured vets, replacement of military hardware, and the value of things Americans could have produced but didn’t. Morover, the vets returning home are not getting the medical help they need. McCain’s plan was more of the same.
(3) Deregulation of banking and bailout – Bush and his buddies finished off the deregulation of banking that began in earnest during Clinton’s presidency. This ideological madness has caused the collapse of investment funds, banks, and the stock value of corporations that depend on them (which is to say most of Wall Street and much of the financial world), as well as a steep decline in the value of most homes in America and a sharp rise in the cost of living in them, foreclosures, and bankruptcies. The Bush administration began the bailing out of the big guys while McCain claimed in the media that the economy was fundamentally sound.
(4) Offshore oil in protected areas – President Bush lied in his radio address when he said that the oil in the offshore protected areas is equal to 10 years of current production. It’s not true. The Energy Information Agency, which is the government agency responsible for making estimates of oil reserves, says there are approximately 8 billion of barrels of oil in the protected areas. Current production is approximately 3 billion barrels a year tofay and that means the oil in the offshore protected areas is equal to less than 3 years of annual production, not ten years.
Republicans like McCain and Palin were pushing offshore drilling in environmentally sensitive areas as part “an ‘all of the above’ strategy to lower gasoline prices and decrease dependence on imported oil. This was a lie as there is not enough oil in these areas to have more than a minimal impact on gas prices (e.g. 3-4 cents per gallon) and even this benefit will not be realized for close to two decades.
(5) Abortion, Contraception and Dirty Politics – Bush was attempting to redefine contraception as abortion just vegore leaving office. Can you imagine living in a place where birth control is considered an “abortion” and health insurers won’t cover it? Where even rape victims are denied emergency contraception?
It seems unbelievable, but the Bush Administration was quietly trying to redefine “abortion” to include birth control. The Houston Chronicle said this could wipe out dozens of state laws that protect reproductive freedom for women and also protect rape victims. Access to basic health care for millions of women would be jeopardized. And it was being pushed as a “rule change” meaning, it wouldn’t need congressional approval.
McCain and Palin’s religious choices and their positions on these issues proposed more of the same dirty politics when it comes to eliminating reproductive freedom for women.
(6) American casualties – Bush and his Administration sacrificed America’s finest young men and women on the altar of oil re: the invasion of an war on Iraq and in Afganistan. (Note these statistics are in a state of flux.)
(7) Civilian death toll – Bush and his administration are responsible for the slaying over 100,000 Iraqi’s (primarily women and children) in an attempt to build American oil hegemony in the middle east, and to secure a strategic position from which an attack on Iran could be launched. (Note these statistics are in a state of flux.)
Romney doesn’t have a strategy and you did a great job of exposing the fact that he doesn’t.
Thank you for the trip down memory lane.
Yes, I believe they are counting on the rest of America forgetting these details. They have put forth some effort in that regard, stating things like “We are tired of the Democrats blaming our current economic condition on the Bush administration.”
They would very much like us to believe that what happened during those eight years has nothing to do with what is occurring now. They are relying on the population to be that short-sited. And, in many cases, they appear to have succeeded. Whenever they are reminded, they scoff and give sarcastic replies, “sure, blame it on the Bush administration, that was four years ago!”
But, in fact, a large part of the global economic crises actually WAS due to the Bush administration. Had Bush lost that election to Gore, I cannot visualize what our economy would currently be like, but I suspect that the entire would would be in a completely different situation than it is at this time. Unfortunately, we will never know.
I was never a big Gore supporter. I had my doubts about him as president. But I always had a major problem with W. W was not presidential material, and should never have held that position. Living through his eight years left me intensely disgusted with the Republicans, and watching them become more and more extremist has further heightened my distaste for their role in our political structure.
I promised myself to turn my back to American politics and I broke my promise.
The Bush Administration bears considerable responsible for the global economic crises. The world over countries, corporations and individuals, directly and indirectly, assign their own fiscal strength based on the US dollar’s standard. In 2007 the US public debt exceeded over $9 trillion dollars and practically all of the US national debt owned by foreigners was held by private investors except for central banks, which held 64%. In June of 2007 the Federal Reserve reported its amount as $755 billion US. That meant the size of the foreign owned portion of the amount owing was almost three times the total amount of currency in circulation.
By 2008 more that 40 % of American families were spending more than they earned. The average US family’s credit card balance reached almost 5 % of its annual income (with a median U.S. household income at $43,200), personal bankruptcies in US have doubled in the last decade and the overall consumer debt reached $2.46 Trillion as of June 2007 (excluding the $440 billion of revolving home equity loans, $600 Billion owed for second mortgages and an overall $9 Trillion in mortgage debt). As such, the total US consumer revolving debt grew to $904 Billion in 2008.
Of course Republicans they claim they are tired of hearing what the Bush Administration did and what it has never been held accountable for. Among Republicans we witness primitive thinkers who are ill-educated and proud of it; adherents to fundamentalist religions and proud of it; in favor of the death penalty and proud of it; patriotic in the extreme; and drawn to conspiracy theories.
These legions of maladjusted adults are fear-filled “little people” projecting false bravado. Clearly they got stuck in childhood black and white thinking, and failed to develop their intellect. Hence they and their leader Romney has nothing to offer but hollow rhetoric.
Once again, I’m swearing off watching the news.
P.S. As you know, I’m visually challenged. My app isn’t working today and I could not see or correct any errors I made in my comment. I could only type and hope for the best. I would appreciate it if you would make any required spelling and grammatical corrections.
No problem, I found a few little things and fixed them. Thanks for the comments!