Political Tools

Go Solo and think for yourself.

After work I sometimes relax in front of the television by surfing for news. From some perspectives, this isn’t a particularly “relaxing” way to wind down, but the act of watching television is passive. You don’t really interact with it, you don’t participate in it, you just move from channel to channel, avoiding the commercials and seeking that little spark of something that might provide a flash of interest. What makes it relaxing is that you don’t need to consider how to react, you just need to watch and think about the content itself. Your mind wanders from topic to topic, firing off emotional sparks into the old logic circuits and driving them to form opinions. Later, when you engage in communication with other individuals, you’ll have some information to draw on.

So it was that I came across Larry King having an interview with Franklin Graham, the son of the Evangelist Billy Graham, discussing the quality of President Obama’s religious beliefs and Franks opinions about Islam being an evil and wicked religion. Apparently this was all sparked by a survey of the American public revealing that 18% believe that Obama is a Muslim. Why is this a factor in anything?

Sometimes I get a kick out of Larry King. His interviewing process is about as passive as you can get. He seldom volunteers personal opinions and avoids judging people he’s interviewing, even if they disgust him personally. It is, in fact, difficult to tell what disgusts Larry. Some of the individuals he’s interviewed have been so unsavory that you can only imagine he’s revolted, but he manages to avoid showing it if he is.

The interview with Franklin Graham served to remind me that we have a large number of political tools and weaponry scattered around this country and this world, and that Franklin himself is one of them. Mainstream media itself, in their desire to gain ratings and make money, frequently picks up these tools and brandishes them. Freedom of speech dictates their right to do so, but it’s not much different than firing a gun in the air just to remind everyone that you’re armed. Not that I’m saying Larry shouldn’t be interviewing these people, but it’s starting to become a problem when you intentionally pick issues that are going to cause dramatic separatism to grow and caustic hatreds to increase. This is what the media thrives on, but is it good for the country? Is it good for the planet? Is it good to highlight our differences so much that we forget our similarities and start staring with paranoid suspicions and distrust at our neighbors? Because this is what our media lives for and what our election campaigns promote.

And we’re fascinated, aren’t we? We’re fascinated by the ugly truth of the matter that a significant portion of us will elect an official based on their religion. We’re fascinated by the opinions of the people around us who apparently harbor intellects radically different than our own. We stare in wonder at the twisted logic of the extremists viewpoints on both sides, and watch with morbid fascination for the fighting to begin. And it’s our fascination that they thrive on, that they feed on. Is our interest in our differences and our hatred and our extremism causing it to increase? I can’t help but think that it probably is. And what is it the religious leaders are spewing in church these days anyway? Are they trying to play it down and smooth things out? Are they preaching tolerance and love and forgiveness, or have they also succumbed to the temptation to play into the hatred, knowing that it brings more interest to the flock than a nice long talk about loving your neighbor?

Islam and Christianity have been rivals since the creation of Islam. How could that ever be different? They’re both evangelistic religions. They both compete for converts from the same planetary pool. Realistically, they should be separated and isolated, but that’s been done before and they just create their own factions and kill each other over different interpretations of their own philosophies. Look at Ireland and Bosnia and Iraq for examples. And comparing religious war to political agencies is an unfair comparison. They relate, but they aren’t the same. Politics and religion use each other, and they share motives – a need to control and dominate and determine the actions of their followers – but they aren’t identical.

There’s a lot of ugliness out there right now. A lot of that ugliness is being promoted and generated by extremist factions. Right now, most of that ugliness is coming out the dark end of the extreme right. We look at the extreme left and know the far end of that route leads into communism. We look at the extreme right and know the far end of that route leads into fascism. At the moment, I’m not to concerned about the extreme left. They have a soft underbelly, and no real motive to haul half the country into bizzaro land. Its the extreme right I’m worried about. They operate on hatred and have a tendency to promote that hatred. The lack of tolerance for anyone not sharing their views is a worry. Their ability to take issues that evoke rage and twist them into a weapon they can use has earned them a following and a place on the world stage. If Darth Vader existed here, he’d be a Republican, and he’d be standing next to Beck and Palin on Fox News.

Somehow we need to get back to the middle where there’s some logic. Can we do that by tugging on both sides? Or will the act of tugging on both sides just end up collecting more extremists? Why are we even talking about where a religious organization can put a building when the country is founded on religious freedom? Why are we even talking about what religion our President happens to favor when the separation of church and state is an important factor in our own stability? Why are any of us listening to hatred spewing from media agencies claiming to be fair and unbiased when they’re donating large amounts of money to one side and promoting a political agenda?

Anyway, tonight I think I’ll skip the news and play some video games instead. My kids will go out and play with the Muslim and Mormon and Atheist kids that live in the neighborhood, and they won’t even discuss religion or politics, they’ll just have fun. I bet they won’t even bomb each other. Who says being an adult makes you intelligent?

24 Responses

  1. I think that civil discussion and discourse is the only way to get beyond all the illogical hate spewing and inflamed rhetoric. Jon Stewart is able to have reasonable discussions, even though he does not hide his point of view, with a wide range of people with whom he does not agree. I think trying to find the places where we agree with each other is harder sometimes but a worthwhile process.

    • I wish we would have more civil discussions, but finding the middle ground doesn’t seem to sell airtime nearly as much as holding up some maniac and letting them spew hatred. I’m concerned about our obsession with the extremes. I certainly agree they should be observed and analyzed, but I think that perhaps we focus on it too much.

  2. Your decision to just play video games instead of torturing yourself with politics was wise and expected. I suggest you try the online game Knightfall. It’s a logic game like Chess which I think is more complicated than Chess even though it’s cartoon looking. Warning though: don’t get addicted.

    • I’ll have to check it out.
      Lately I’ve been playing Risk a lot with the kids.
      It’s great for teaching them geography.
      (My son still gets South America mixed up with Africa).

  3. Hertzberg has a great New Yorker piece in the Aug. 16/23 issue that touches on this via the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque” that has the Right choking on its own saliva. As a New York-type myself, I think it’s right on the money. A majority and plurality of New Yorkers do not oppose it.

    • That’s interesting.

      The funny thing is, while the majority of the New Yorkers may not oppose the mosque, the ones that do oppose it are the ones who will get the airtime.

      I’ll have to check out the article.

  4. Awesome post, dood. You’ve hit on many of the things I’ve been asking myself. And reached many of the same conclusions.

    I blame the media, specifically cable news, for much of it, simply because that’s where most of us find out what the rest of us are doing. And the media focus on our differences because those are more exciting than our commonalities. The media created the name “Mosque at Ground Zero” and became so enamored with it and the chaos they’ve created that they can’t bear to leave it. (Would non-New-Yorkers have even known about it otherwise? Would protesters keep protesting if the cameras weren’t there?) The great middle ground of politics, where most of us live (or used to live) is boring compared to what the whack jobs at the outer edges are doing, so the media focus on the nuts. “If it bleeds, it leads.”

    Journalism as I learned it is dead. Objective, impartial reporting — just the facts — doesn’t seem to exist anymore (so stuffy and boring). Instead of keeping personal opinion out of it, it’s now more profitable to gin up viewers by adopting a specific point of view or deliberately pandering to one’s audience. Nobody reports just the news; they deliver commentary and opinion tailored to their liberal or conservative audience. Lacking real news, they “report” on the reports of the other guy, or “report” on what their own guys and gals are doing — this one’s now embedded in Afghanistan; that one’s just written a book and we’re doing a one-hour special to cover it.

    Profit is more important than truth.

    • Thanks Pied.
      That pretty much perfectly sums up what I was getting at.
      As the mainstream media becomes more “tabloidized” I have no idea how far it will go, or what will evolve out of it. “Unbiased” is nothing more than a tag line anymore.

  5. You said it. Common sense doesn’t bring in viewers.

  6. I misread your first sentence and thought you wrote ‘suffering’ instead of ‘surfing’…… it’s just as apt really

  7. If we simply removed all the religious extremists then I could stop worrying and go back to playing Warcraft in peace!

  8. My husband is a Republican. It’s my own little version of “Sleeping With the Enemy”. Luckily, Adam is repulsed by the crazy intolerant religious nut jobs in the far right. Otherwise, you could watch us for entertainment on “Divorce Court”.

    • Ha! I’m in the same situation actually.
      I wrote a post once titled “I married a Republican” but decided not to publish it. To be fair, though, my wife has become more and more independent since the Bush years.

  9. there is no place in the public political discourse for a ‘centrist’. i am considered either “left” or “right”, depending on where the person across the table is positioned.

    regarding the islamic center? i have grown to be deeply disgusted with the failure of the ‘sound-bite repeating public” to make the effort to learn the facts. there is no interest in truth. just sensationalism and jaw-flappage….

  10. Two things that bother me the most about certain religious people-Fundamentalists and their need to interfere in politics and scientific research.

    Fundamentalists have such a narrow world view that anyone slightly different from them is a “wrong” and a possible “threat”. What an ignorant waste of time!

    There have also been too many cases recently where certain religious leaders have interferred in political decisions that they have no right interfering in. Here in North America, there is a thing called separation between church and state, but you sure as hell wouldn’t know it sometimes! Churches still have FAR too much sway when it comes to certain political decisions and scientific research. (ie. Stem cell research)

    • Yes, they do seem obsessed with anything related to reproduction don’t they? It’s been a primary rallying point for the right-wing, they’ve basically used it to manipulate the churches and vice versa. Stem cell research, abortion, human embryos, and sex education are all issues where the churches seem to want control. If that wasn’t enough, now they’re moving into real estate?

      I guess the litmus test is in this regard would be atheism. The day you see an openly atheist official get elected in a predominantly religious political location is the day you know that people are looking more at the issues and governing capability than someone’s personal religious beliefs. We’re not there yet.

  11. My kids will go out and play with the Muslim and Mormon and Atheist kids that live in the neighborhood, and they won’t even discuss religion or politics, they’ll just have fun. I bet they won’t even bomb each other. Who says being an adult makes you intelligent?

    Maybe kids should run the world. Food would taste better anyway.

  12. [...] Aug 25, 2010 by PiedType Leave a Comment A discussion over at “Sargastic Irrevalence” about tolerance, intolerance, and current events brought to mind the song “You’ve Got [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 78 other followers